Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from JTM and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

The impact of laser ablation on optical soft tissue differentiation for tissue specific laser surgery-an experimental ex vivo study

Florian Stelzle14*, Ingo Terwey1, Christian Knipfer1, Werner Adler5, Katja Tangermann-Gerk24, Emeka Nkenke14 and Michael Schmidt234

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glückstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

2 blz—Bavarian Laser Center, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

3 Chair of Photonic Technologies, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

4 SAOT—Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

5 Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Translational Medicine 2012, 10:123  doi:10.1186/1479-5876-10-123

Published: 15 June 2012

Abstract

Background

Optical diffuse reflectance can remotely differentiate various bio tissues. To implement this technique in an optical feedback system to guide laser surgery in a tissue-specific way, the alteration of optical tissue properties by laser ablation has to be taken into account. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the general feasibility of optical soft tissue differentiation by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy under the influence of laser ablation, comparing the tissue differentiation results before and after laser intervention.

Methods

A total of 70 ex vivo tissue samples (5 tissue types) were taken from 14 bisected pig heads. Diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded before and after Er:YAG-laser ablation. The spectra were analyzed and differentiated using principal component analysis (PCA), followed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA). To assess the potential of tissue differentiation, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity was computed for each pair of tissue types before and after laser ablation, and compared to each other.

Results

Optical tissue differentiation showed good results before laser exposure (total classification error 13.51%). However, the tissue pair nerve and fat yielded lower AUC results of only 0.75. After laser ablation slightly reduced differentiation results were found with a total classification error of 16.83%. The tissue pair nerve and fat showed enhanced differentiation (AUC: 0.85). Laser ablation reduced the sensitivity in 50% and specificity in 80% of the cases of tissue pair comparison. The sensitivity of nerve–fat differentiation was enhanced by 35%.

Conclusions

The observed results show the general feasibility of tissue differentiation by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy even under conditions of tissue alteration by laser ablation. The contrast enhancement for the differentiation between nerve and fat tissue after ablation is assumed to be due to laser removal of the surrounding lipid-rich nerve sheath. The results create the basis for a guidance system to control laser ablation in a tissue-specific way.

Keywords:
Laser ablation; Laser surgery guidance; Remote optical measurement; Remote surgical methods; Spectra analysis