Skip to main content
Download PDF

Expression TGM2 and BNIP3 have prognostic significance in laryngeal cancer patients receiving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy: A retrospective study

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 10, Article number: 64 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to determine the pattern and correlation between expression of the HIF-1α transcriptional targets TGM2 and BNIP3 in laryngeal cancer, and investigate the association of BNIP3 and TGM2 with clinical outcome in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

Immunostaining with antibodies specific to BNIP3 and TGM2 was performed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from 148 laryngeal SCC patients. BNIP3 and TGM2 expression was scored as high or low, based on the number of tumor cells stained and the staining intensity. All patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Patient follow up and clinicopathological data were compared using the Chi-squared test, univariate and multivariate analyses, and survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

The 3, 5 and 10-year overall survival rates (OS) for all patients were 77.7%, 71.6%, 56.4%, respectively. Primary tumor site, T stage, overall stage, lymph-node metastasis, BNIP3 expression and TGM2 expression were significant prognostic factors for OS in univariate analysis. Negative cervical lymph nodes, high BNIP3 expression and low TGM2 expression were independent prognostic factors of improved OS in multivariate analysis. BNIP3 expression correlates with TGM2 expression in laryngeal SCC (P = 0.012).

Conclusions

This study indicates that lymph-node metastasis, BNIP3 expression and TGM2 expression are independent prognostic factors in laryngeal SCC patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy. Further studies are required to investigate how BNIP3 and/or TGM2 influence the prognosis of laryngeal SCC patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy, and to determine how TGM2 and BNIP3 expression are regulated.

Background

In the United States, laryngeal cancer accounted for approximately 0.85% of new cancer diagnoses and 0.65% of all cancer deaths in 2008 [1]. Postoperative radiotherapy (PRT) is widely advocated for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgical resection.

The most important factor in the prognostic evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system, of which nodal stage is the most relevant factor. However, the outcome of patients with the same TNM stage can vary, which has led to a concerted effort to define additional TNM subcategories with a similar prognosis, and recent research has focused on the identification of molecular and biologic prognostic factors, regardless of TNM staging.

The hypoxic fraction of human cancers is resistant to radiation therapy due to reduced generation of oxygen radicals. The transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1α) upregulates expression of a variety of target genes under hypoxic conditions, and plays a major role in determining tumor radiosensitivity. Therefore, HIF-1α and HIF-1α target genes represent potential therapeutic targets to influence the effect of hypoxia on tumor radiosensitivity.

BNIP3, a hypoxia-inducible pro-apoptotic gene belonging to the BCL2 family, was originally identified as an adenovirus E1B19-kDa protein-interacting gene. In normal tissues, BNIP3 expression is upregulated in hypoxic conditions by hypoxia inducible factor HIF-1α and can lead to cell death [2–4]. In tumors, BNIP3 is silenced via epigenetic mechanisms, such as promoter hypermethylation and histone deacetylation [5]. Downregulation of BNIP3 results in the failure of tumor cells to undergo cell death, and is associated with chemoresistance and poorer survival [6, 7].

The transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) family catalyze formation of an amide bond between the carboxamide groups of peptide-bound glutamine residues and primary amino groups in various compounds [8]. One member of the TGM2 family, TGase 2 (TGM2) can enhance the survival of hypoxic cells and has been identified as a HIF-1α transcriptional target. Hypoxia upregulates TGM2 expression via a HIF-1α dependent pathway and concurrently activates intracellular TGM2 activity [9]. Increased expression of TGM2 is associated with drug resistance in cancer [10], due to activation of nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) via cross-linking and polymerization of free I-kB by TGM2 [11].

Although BNIP3 and TGM2 are associated with drug resistance and provide valuable prognostic markers in a variety of cancers [6, 7, 10], the expression and significance of BNIP3 and TGM2 have not been investigated in patients with laryngeal SCC receiving postoperative radiotherapy. Therefore, we examined the pattern and correlation between TGM2 and BNIP3 expression to determine their association with clinical factors and outcome in patients with SCC of the larynx.

The results of this study indicate that, in addition to lymph node involvement, the expression levels of BNIP3 and TGM2 are novel independent predictive factors for survival in laryngeal SCC patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

Patients and tissue samples

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Human Ethics Committee of Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center. A total of 148 patients with histologically confirmed SCC of the larynx treated from 1997 to 2003 at the Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center were included. Relevant clinical pathologic features (Table 1) were obtained from the medical files and/or by telephone interviews with the patient or their relatives. Tumor types and histological grade classifications were designated according to World Health Organization classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumors [12].

Table 1 Expression of TGM2 and BNIP3 and their relationship with clinicopathological characteristics in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients
Full size table

Surgery

All patients underwent a major surgical intervention at Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center; patients irradiated after excisional biopsies were not included in the study. In total, 116/148 (78.4%) of the laryngeal SCC patients were treated with partial laryngectomy and 32/148 (21.6%) were treated with total laryngectomy. Unilateral or bilateral neck node dissection was performed in 79 (53.4%) of the patients.

Radiotherapy

The indications for postoperative radiotherapy in our hospital at the time of the study included clinically or microscopically positive surgical margins, pathologically confirmed positive neck nodes and/or the advanced clinical stages of primary laryngeal cancer (T3, T4). Only patients in good general condition with no distant metastases were considered for PRT.

The total radiation dose in the clinical target volume area ranged from 36 to 82 Gy, with a median value of 60 Gy. Lower doses (< 50 Gy) were given to patients whose clinical condition demanded premature termination of the treatment (due to local progression during PRT, deteriorating performance status or intercurrent disease) or patients who refused to complete treatment. Higher doses (> 70 Gy) were given to patients with a clinically palpable mass after surgery, or patients who required an increased total dose due to long duration treatment gaps.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining

A total of 148, routinely processed laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma paraffin-embedded samples were cut into 4 μm sections, dried overnight at 56°C, deparaffinized, rehydrated, antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer at 92°C using a microwave oven and the sections were incubated in 3% H2O2 to block endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were incubated in mouse monoclonal [CUB 7402] anti-TGM2 antibody (ab2386, ABCAM, dilution 1:100) or mouse monoclonal [Ana40] anti-BNIP3 antibody (ab10433, ABCAM, dilution 1:100) overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber, staining was visualized using an avidin-biotin technique and DAB staining, followed by hematoxylin nuclear counterstaining. Negative controls were prepared by omitting the primary antibody. Histological and IHC evaluation were performed independently by two pathologists while blinded to the clinicopathological outcomes of the patients. Slides with indeterminate evaluation were re-evaluated, and a consensus was reached. Briefly, each slide was examined in its entirety under a light microscope. Pilot studies indicated BNIP3 staining was both nuclear and cytoplasmic (Figure 1); therefore, the intensity of nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was defined as no staining (0), weak staining (1), moderate staining (2) or strong staining (3), and the percentage of cells stained was scored as 0-10% (1), 10-50% (2), 51-80% (3) or 81-100% (4). Tumors were considered highly positive if they demonstrated moderate or strong staining (2 or 3) in greater than 50% of cells (3 or 4). TGM2 expression was scored using the same intensity, percentage scores and positive criteria as BNIP3, as previously reported [13].

Figure 1
figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining for TGM2 and BNIP3 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Positive expression of BNIP3 was mainly localized in the nucleus, but was also observed in the cytoplasm of tumor cells. Positive expression of TGM2 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of tumor cells, but was also observed in the nucleus. Representative images of (A) highly positive BNIP3 expression in tumor cells, (B) low BNIP3 expression in tumor cells, (C) highly positive TGM2 expression in tumor cells and (D) low TGM2 expression in tumor cells (SP × 400)

Full size image

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows. The χ2 test was used to evaluate categorical variables. Associations between clinicopathological features and TGM2 or BNIP3 immunohistochemical expression were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test of independence. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Cox regression model. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the onset of treatment to the date of death or survival status at the last date of follow-up. OS probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan- Meier method and significant differences were assessed using the log-rank test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and P values < 0.01 were considered strongly statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological features

In total, 148 laryngeal SCC patients (145 males and 3 females) with a median age of 60 years (range: 23-85 years) were included in this study. Table 1 presents a summary of the gender, age, tumor site, tumor stage, histological grade, smoking index, alcohol consumption, total radiation dose and surgery margins of the patients. According to the 6th Edition of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification system, 26 patients were Stage I, 70 were Stage II, 28 were Stage III and 24 were Stage IV.

Patient outcomes after follow-up

The last follow-up date was June 29th, 2010, and no patients were lost during follow-up. The 3, 5 and 10 year overall survival rates (OS) for all patients were 77.7%, 71.6% and 56.4%, respectively (Figure 2). Sixty two cancer-related deaths were reported, with a median time to death of 35 months (range 1-108 months). There are 6 non-cancer-related deaths. The median time to non-cancer-related death is 30 months (range 18-78 months).

Figure 2
figure 2

Survival curves for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. (A) Overall survival (OS) for all patients. (B) OS in patients with different primary tumor sites. (C) OS in patients with different T stages. (D) OS in patients with and without cervical lymph node metastasis. (E) OS in patients with different UICC stages. (F) OS in patients with high and low TGM2 expression. (G) OS in patients with high and low BNIP3 expression. (H) OS in patients with high and low BNIP3 and TGM2 expression.

Full size image

Immunohistochemical expression of TGM2 and BNIP3

Positive expression of BNIP3 was mainly localized in the nucleus, with some expression detected in the cytoplasm of laryngeal SCC tumor cells. Positive expression of TGM2 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of laryngeal SCC tumor cells, with some expression detected in the nucleus (Figure 1). The immunostaining scores are listed in the Table 1. TGM2 was highly positive in 47.3% (70/148) of the tumors, and BNIP3 was highly positive in 71.6% (106/148) of the tumors. Furthermore, highly positive BNIP3 expression was correlated with highly positive TGM2 expression (P = 0.012) and alcohol consumption (P = 0.009; Table 1).

BNIP and TGM2 are associated with patient prognosis

Univariate analyses indicated a significant association between OS and primary tumor site, T stage, cervical lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, TGM2 expression and BNIP3 expression in laryngeal SCC (Table 2, Figure 2). Patients with both high BNIP3 expression and low TGM2 expression had a significantly better overall survival, compared to patients with low BNIP3 expression and high TGM2 expression, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3, 5 and 10-year overall survival rates (OS) of patients who expressed high levels of BNIP3 and low levels of TGM2 were 87.8%, 85.7% and 76.9%, respectively.

Table 2 The relationship of clinicopathological variables and immunohistochemical features with overall survival (OS) in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients
Full size table

Multivariate analysis

Multivariate survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression model to calculate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for each clinicopathological variable. The model was simplified in a stepwise fashion by removing variables with a P value ≥0.05. The analysis revealed that TGM2 expression status, BNIP3 expression status and cervical lymph node metastasis were statistically significant independent predictive factors for OS in laryngeal SCC patients (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate analysis of the effect of clinicopathological factors on overall survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients
Full size table

Discussion

In this study we evaluated the significance of various prognostic factors in patients with SCC of the larynx treated with primary surgery and PRT. No patients received any other form of adjuvant systemic treatment. The overall survival (OS) of the patients was significantly related to the UICC stage, in agreement with previous reports that the initial classification (T stage, N stage and total stage) are significant prognostic factors for survival in laryngeal SCC [14–17]. In this study, univariate analysis also indicated that tumor sites in the supraglottis were correlated with a significantly poorer prognosis.

It has been reported that the number, site and volume of metastatic lymph nodes can negatively influence the prognosis in laryngeal carcinoma [18, 19], and these results were confirmed by our study, as univariate analysis indicated that the presence of metastatic lymph nodes (P < 0.001) had a negative prognostic value. The relationship between nodal involvement and local control has been examined in several patient series. van den Bogaert et al. and Wall et al. [20, 21] reported 5 year local control rates of 70% and 79% in patients without positive node involvement, compared to 49% and 57% in patients with clinically positive nodes. Three large multicenter studies of laryngeal SCC patients treated with PRT have reported similar recurrence rates [22–24], indicating that cervical lymph node status is the most important tumor-related prognostic factor in head and neck cancer patients. Additionally, the incidence of local recurrence and risk of distant metastases increase as the tumor burden in the neck increases [25, 16].

To our knowledge, no previous studies have evaluated the prognostic value of TGM2 and BNIP3 in head-and-neck cancer in patients treated with PRT. In this study, univariate analyses and multivariate analysis indicated that high expression of TGM2 and/or low expression of BNIP3 are associated with poorer overall survival in laryngeal SCC patients receiving PRT.

Several factors may explain the association between high expression of TGM2 and poorer OS. TGM2 expression can promote cell surface interaction with fibronectin and protect breast cancer cells from apoptosis [26]. Intense expression at the stromal-epithelial interface suggests that TGM2 plays a role in cell adhesion, cell migration, invasiveness and metastasis [27], and Dardik et al. reported that stromal expression of TGM2 in the endothelium of newly formed blood vessels may lead to tumor growth and metastasis [28]. Additionally, TGM2 can activate NF-κB by crosslinking and polymerization, or by destabilizing the association of the p65/p50 (NF-κB) complex with IκB [27]. Aberrant activation of NF-κB complexes can contribute to tumorigenesis by regulating expression of genes which promote cancer cell growth and survival. Constitutive expression of NF-κB has also been implicated in tumor drug resistance. Recent experimental studies by Dae-Seok Kim et al. demonstrated that inhibition of TGase 2 using siRNA, cystamine, glucosamine or R2 peptides promotes cell death in drug-resistant cancer cells via NF-κB inactivation [29]; However, Barnes et al. [30] suggested that reduced TGM2 activity is associated with tumor growth and metastasis, while Fesus et al. reported that increased activity of TGM2 in cells undergoing apoptosis indicates a pro-apoptotic function [31]. Collectively, these studies indicate that the role of TGM2 may depend on the type of cancer, the cell type and cancer stage; and this study demonstrates that high positive expression of TGM2 is associated with poorer overall survival in laryngeal SCC patients receiving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

Little is known about how TGM2 expression may affect the treatment efficacy of radiotherapy. Yuan et al. reported that the small molecule TGM2 inhibitor KCC009, which inhibits the ability of TGM2 to bind fibronectin and prevents the disposition of linear fibronectin strands in the ECM, promotes apoptosis and enhances radiosensitivity in cultured IOMM-Lee meningioma cells and meningioma tumor explants [32]. Mian et al. discovered that overexpression of TGM2 or a cross-linking defective TGM2 mutant (C277S) in malignant hamster fibrosarcoma cells (MetB) lead to delayed S-phase to G2/M progression [33]. As the G2/M-phase is the most sensitive phase to radiation, this observation may explain the association between overexpression of TGM2 and adverse outcome in patients receiving radiotherapy. Though this evidence strongly suggests a role for TGM2 in cancer, the exact molecular mechanism which by high levels of TGM2 expression lead to an adverse prognosis in laryngeal SCC is not know and requires further research.

BNIP3 is strongly upregulated in response to hypoxia. Generally, overexpression of BNIP3 induces necrotic-like cell death, autophagy or apoptotic cell death. However, it has been suggested that the ability of BNIP3 to induce cell death is blocked in cancer cells [34]. BNIP3 is downregulated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and correlates with reduced patient survival [5, 6]. BNIP3 is also downregulated in oxaliplatin-resistant colon cancer cells [7] and knockdown of BNIP3 using siRNA or S100A4 results in resistance to fluorouracil (5-FU) and/or gemcitabine in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells [6], indicating that BNIP3 is an important regulator during drug-induced cell death in cancer cells.

This study indicates that reduced expression of BNIP3 is associated with poorer overall survival in laryngeal SCC patients receiving PRT. The ability of BNIP3 to affect the efficacy of radiotherapy is poorly characterized. Kennedy et al. observed that overexpression of the apoptosis-related gene BNIP3 could affect the sensitivity of CRC cells to combined paclitaxel, radiation, and 5-FU therapy [35], and the molecular mechanism by which BNIP3 expression affects the prognosis of patients with laryngeal SCC requires further study.

In this study we observed that BNIP3 expression was correlated with TGM2 expression in laryngeal SCC (P = 0.012). TGM2 activates NF-κB, via crosslinking and polymerization or destabilizing the association of the p65/p50 (NF-κB) complex with IκB [27]. Therefore, we hypothesize that increased expression of TGM2 leads to down-regulation of BNIP3 because BNIP3 expression can be repressed through the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) binding to the bnip3 promoter [36].

The results of this study should be interpreted with caution as this is a retrospective study of a relatively small number of samples. Use of alternative methodologies such as microdissection and in-situ hybridization and/or RT-PCR are required to confirm these results at the RNA level.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that the expression levels of BNIP3 and TGM2 are novel predictive factors of survival in laryngeal SCC patients treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy, and further study is required to determine the molecular mechanisms by which BNIP3 and TGM2 influence the prognosis of these patients. Additionally, the mechanism regulating the correlation between TGM2 and BNIP3 expression in laryngeal SCC requires further investigation.

Abbreviations

PRT:

Postoperative radiotherapy

SCC:

Squamous cell carcinoma

HIF-1:

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1

TGM2:

Transglutaminase 2

NF-kB:

Nuclear factor-kB

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

UICC:

International Union Against Cancer

OS:

Overall survival.

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008, 58: 71-96. 10.3322/CA.2007.0010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruick RK: Expression of the gene encoding the proapoptotic Nip3 protein is induced by hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 9082-9087. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo K, Searfoss G, Krolikowski D, Pagnoni M, Franks C, Clark K, Yu KT, Jaye M, Ivashchenko Y: Hypoxia induces the expression of the pro-apoptotic gene BNIP3. Cell Death Differ. 2001, 8: 367-376. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Regula KM, Ens K, Kirshenbaum LA: Inducible expression of BNIP3 provokes mitochondrial defects and hypoxia-mediated cell death of ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 2002, 91: 226-231. 10.1161/01.RES.0000029232.42227.16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okami J, Simeone DM, Logsdon CD: Silencing of the hypoxia-inducible cell death protein BNIP3 in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 5338-5346. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erkan M, Kleeff J, Esposito I, Giese T, Ketterer K, Büchler MW, Giese NA, Friess H: Loss of BNIP3 expression is a late event in pancreatic cancer contributing to chemoresistance and worsened prognosis. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 4421-4432. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang H, Liu YJ, Liu M, Li X: Establishment and gene analysis of an oxaliplatin-resistant colon cancer cell line THC8307/L-OHP. Anticancer Drugs. 2007, 18: 633-639. 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3280200428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Folk JE: Transglutaminases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980, 49: 517-531. 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.002505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jang GY, Jeon JH, Cho SY, Shin DM, Kim CW, Jeong EM, Bae HC, Kim TW, Lee SH, Choi Y, Lee DS, Park SC, Kim IG: Transglutaminase 2 suppresses apoptosis by modulating caspase 3 and NF-kappaB activity in hypoxic tumor cells. Oncogene. 2010, 29: 356-367. 10.1038/onc.2009.342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehta K, Fok J, Miller FR, Koul D, Sahin AA: Prognostic significance of tissue transglutaminase in drug resistant and metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 8068-8076. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Kim YS, Choi DH, Bang MS, Han TR, Joh TH, Kim SY: Transglutaminase 2 induces nuclear factor-kappaB activation via a novel pathway in BV-2 microglia. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 53725-53735. 10.1074/jbc.M407627200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson L: World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006, 85: 74-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boddy JL, Fox SB, Han C, Campo L, Turley H, Kanga S, Malone PR, Harris AL: The androgen receptor is significantly associated with vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia sensing via hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1a, HIF-2a, and the prolyl hydroxylases in human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 7658-7663. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bastit L, Blot E, Debourdeau P, Menard J, Bastit P, Le Fur R: Influence of the delay of adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy on relapse and survival in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001, 49 (1): 139-146. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01376-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leemans CR, Tiwari R, Nauta JJ, van der Waal I, Snow GB: Recurrence at the primary site in head and neck cancer and the significance of neck node metastases as a prognostic factor. Cancer. 1993, 73 (1): 187-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leibel SA, Scott CB, Mohiuddin M, Marcial VA, Coia LR, Davis LW, Fuks Z: The effect of local-regional control on distant metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the head and neck: results of an analysis from the RTOG head and neck database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991, 21 (3): 549-556. 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90669-U.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richard JM, Sancho-Garnier H, Micheau C, Saravane D, Cachin Y: Prognostic factors in cervical lymph node metastasis in upper respiratory and digestive tract carcinomas: study of 1713 cases during a 15-year period. Laryngoscope. 1987, 97 (1): 97-101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stell PM: Prognosis in laryngeal carcinoma: tumor factors. Clin Otolaryngol. 1990, 15 (1): 69-81. 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1990.tb00436.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffstetter S, Malissard L, N'Guyen TD, Panis X, Jung GM, Bachaud JM, Prevost B, Quint R, Chaplain G, Eschwège F, Rambert P, Fleury-Touzeau F: Results of postoperative cervical node irradiation in carcinoma of the pharyngo-larynx. A study of the cooperative group of radiotherapist. Bull Cancer Radiother. 1996, 83 (2): 86-89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van den Bogaert W, Ostyn F, van der Schueren E: The different clinical presentation, behaviour and prognosis of carcinomas originating in the epilarynx and lower supraglottis. Radiother Oncol. 1983, 1 (2): 117-131. 10.1016/S0167-8140(83)80015-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wall TJ, Peters LJ, Brown BW, Oswald MJ, Milas L: Relationship between lymph nodal status and primary tumor control probability in tumors of the supraglottic larynx. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985, 11 (11): 1895-1902. 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90269-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kramer S, Gelber RD, Snow JB, Marcial VA, Lowry LD, Davis LW, Chandler R: Combined radiation therapy and surgery in the management of advanced head and neck cancer: final report of the study 73-03 of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Head Neck Surg. 1987, 10 (1): 19-30. 10.1002/hed.2890100105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen TD, Malissard L, Théobald S, Eschwège F, Panis X, Bachaud JM, Rambert P, Chaplain G, Quint R: Advanced carcinoma of the larynx: results of surgery and radiotherapy without induction chemotherapy (1980-1985): a multivariate analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996, 5 (5): 1013-1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolf GT, Hong WK, Fisher SG: Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991, 324 (24): 1685-1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leibel SA, Fuks Z: The impact of local tumor control on the outcome of human cancer. Current topics in clinical radiobiology of tumors. Edited by: Beck-B ornholdt HP. 1993, Berlin: Springer-Ve rlag, 113-127.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Mangala LS, Fok JY, Zorrilla-Calancha IR, Verma A, Mehta K: Tissue transglutaminase expression promotes cell attachment, invasion and survival in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 2459-2470. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mann AP, Verma A, Sethi G, Manavathi B, Wang H, Fok JY, Kunnumakkara AB, Kumar R, Aggarwal BB, Mehta K: Overexpression of tissue transglutaminase leads to constitutive activation of nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer cells: delineation of a novel pathway. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 8788-8795. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dardik R, Inbal A: Complex formation between tissue transglutaminase II (tTG) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2): proposed mechanism for modulation of endothelial cell response to VEGF. Exp Cell Res. 2006, 312: 2973-2982. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.05.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim DS, Park KS, Jeong KC, Lee BI, Lee CH, Kim SY: Glucosamine is an effective chemo-sensitizer via transglutaminase 2 inhibition. Cancer Lett. 2009, 273: 243-249. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.08.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barnes RN, Bungay PJ, Elliott BM, Walton PL, Griffin M: Alterations in the distribution and activity of transglutaminase during tumour growth and metastasis. Carcinogenesis. 1985, 6: 459-463. 10.1093/carcin/6.3.459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fesus L, Thomazy V, Falus A: Induction and activation of tissue transglutaminase during programmed cell death. FEBS Lett. 1987, 224: 104-108. 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80430-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yuan L, Behdad A, Siegel M, Khosla C, Higashikubo R, Rich KM: Tissue transgluaminase 2 expression in meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 2008, 90: 125-132. 10.1007/s11060-008-9642-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mian S: el Alaoui S, Lawry J, Gentile V, Davies PJ, Griffin M: The importance of the GTP-binding protein tissue transglutaminase in the regulation of cell cycle progression. FEBS Lett. 1995, 370: 27-31. 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00782-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kothari S, Cizeau J, McMillan-Ward E, Israels SJ, Bailes M, Ens K, Kirshenbaum LA, Gibson SB: BNIP3 plays a role in hypoxic cell death in human epithelial cells that is inhibited by growth factors EGF and IGF. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 4734-4744. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kennedy AS, Harrison GH, Mansfield CM, Zhou XJ, Xu JF, Balcer-Kubiczek EK: Survival of colorectal cancer cell lines treated with paclitaxel, radiation, and 5-FU: effect of TP53 or hMLH1 deficiency. Int J Cancer. 2000, 90: 175-185. 10.1002/1097-0215(20000820)90:4<175::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-W.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baetz D, Regula KM, Ens K, Shaw J, Kothari S, Yurkova N, Kirshenbaum LA: Nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated cell survival involves transcriptional silencing of the mitochondrial death gene BNIP3 in ventricular myocytes. Circulation. 2005, 112: 3777-3785. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.573899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Rong-Zhen Luo, Dr. Shao-Ye Qiu and Dr. Jia-Bing Lu for immunohistochemical analysis. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, P. R. China, (To: WHH, No. 9151008901000223) and the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong, P. R. China, (To: WHH, No. 2010B031600086).

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, People's Republic of China

      Ting Jin

    2. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat -sen University Cancer center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China

      Huan-Xin Lin, Hui Lin, Nan Ge, Xiu-Yu Cai, Rui Sun, Wen-Kuan Chen, Qiu-Li Li & Wei-Han Hu

    3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat -sen University Cancer center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China

      Huan-Xin Lin, Hui Lin, Nan Ge, Xiu-Yu Cai, Rui Sun & Wei-Han Hu

    4. Department of Oncology, Guangdong Second Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China

      Li-Bing Guo

    5. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat -sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China

      Wen-Kuan Chen & Qiu-Li Li

    Authors
    1. Ting Jin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Huan-Xin Lin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Hui Lin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Li-Bing Guo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Nan Ge
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Xiu-Yu Cai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Rui Sun
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Wen-Kuan Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Qiu-Li Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Wei-Han Hu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Wei-Han Hu.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributions

    TJ, HXL, LBG, HL, RS, WKC, and QLL carried out the cases collection, TJ and HL carried out the immunohistochemical staining work, TJ, HL, XYC and WHH analyzed results. WHH conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Ting Jin, Huan-Xin Lin, Hui Lin, Li-Bing Guo contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

    Authors’ original file for figure 1

    Authors’ original file for figure 2

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Jin, T., Lin, HX., Lin, H. et al. Expression TGM2 and BNIP3 have prognostic significance in laryngeal cancer patients receiving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy: A retrospective study. J Transl Med 10, 64 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-64

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-64

    Keywords

    Journal of Translational Medicine

    ISSN: 1479-5876

    Contact us