Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

Molecular signatures of maturing dendritic cells: implications for testing the quality of dendritic cell therapies

Ping Jin email, Tae Hee Han email, Jiaqiang Ren email, Stefanie Saunders email, Ena Wang email, Francesco M Marincola email and David F Stroncek email

Journal of Translational Medicine 2010, 8:4doi:10.1186/1479-5876-8-4

Published: 15 January 2010

Abstract (provisional)

Background

Dendritic cells (DCs) are often produced by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) stimulation of monocytes. To improve the effectiveness of DC adoptive immune cancer therapy, many different agents have been used to mature DCs. We analyzed the kinetics of DC maturation by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon gamma (IFNg) induction in order to characterize the usefulness of mature DCs (mDCs) for immune therapy and to identify biomarkers for assessing the quality of mDCs.

Methods

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from 6 healthy subjects by apheresis, monocytes were isolated by elutriation, and immature DCs (iDCs) were produced by 3 days of culture with GM-CSF and IL-4. The iDCs were sampled after 4, 8 and 24 hours in culture with LPS and IFNg and were then assessed by flow cytometry, ELISA, and global gene and microRNA (miRNA) expression analysis.

Results

After 24 hours of LPS and IFNg stimulation,DC surface expression of CD80, CD83, CD86, and HLA Class II antigens were up-regulated. Th1 attractant genes such as CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 and CCL5 were up-regulated during maturation but not Treg attractants such as CCL22 and CXCL12. The expression of classical mDC biomarker genes CD83, CCR7, CCL5, CCL8, SOD2, MT2A, OASL, GBP1 and HES4 were up-regulated throughout maturation while MTIB, MTIE, MTIG, MTIH, GADD45A and LAMP3 were only up-regulated late in maturation. The expression of miR-155 was up-regulated 8-fold in mDCs.

Conclusion

DCs, matured with LPS and IFNg, were characterized by increased levels of Th1 attractants as opposed to Treg attractants and may be particularly effective for adoptive immune cancer therapy.

The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.