Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from JTM and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research

MiRNA-205 modulates cellular invasion and migration via regulating zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells

Kayoko Matsushima, Hajime Isomoto*, Naoyuki Yamaguchi, Naoki Inoue, Haruhisa Machida, Toshiyuki Nakayama, Tomayoshi Hayashi, Masaki Kunizaki, Shigekazu Hidaka, Takeshi Nagayasu, Masahiro Nakashima, Kenta Ujifuku, Norisato Mitsutake, Akira Ohtsuru, Shunichi Yamashita, Manav Korpal, Yibin Kang, Philip A Gregory, Gregory J Goodall, Shigeru Kohno and Kazuhiko Nakao

Journal of Translational Medicine 2011, 9:30  doi:10.1186/1479-5876-9-30

PubMed Commons is an experimental system of commenting on PubMed abstracts, introduced in October 2013. Comments are displayed on the abstract page, but during the initial closed pilot, only registered users can read or post comments. Any researcher who is listed as an author of an article indexed by PubMed is entitled to participate in the pilot. If you would like to participate and need an invitation, please email info@biomedcentral.com, giving the PubMed ID of an article on which you are an author. For more information, see the PubMed Commons FAQ.

correction

Hajime Isomoto   (2011-04-11 09:15)  Nagasaki University Hospital email

Please change as follows.
B.21
miR-205 induces an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like phenotype through regulating zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) expression
should be corrected into
'Inhibition of miR-205 induces an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like phenotype through regulating zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) expression'

B.23
The miR-205 _expression levels did not differ among the histological subclasses of ESCC differentiation (Figure 5C), albeit those in invasive ESCC with poor differentiation were significantly lower than in intraepithelial ESCC (Figure 5D).
should be corrected into
'The miR-205 _expression levels did not differ among the histological subclasses of ESCC differentiation (Figure 5C), albeit those in invasive ESCC with poor differentiation were significantly higher than in intraepithelial ESCC (Figure 5D)'

Competing interests

none

top

Post a comment